A Report of the Two-Day Specialized Conference of “Ibn Sina and Islamic Philosophers”
20.11.2011
The 12th
Conference from the series of conferences on reviewing
and revisiting the history of philosophy, titled “Ibn
Sina and Islamic Philosophers” (the development of
Islamic philosophy in 350-550 AH) was held on 18-19
October, 2011 in Talash Cultural-Sport Complex by the
Sadra Islamic Philosophy Institute with the cooperation
of the Scientific Society of History of Philosophy. This
national Conference, which was held alongside many other
research activities in order to attain the purposes of
the Center for Compiling a Comprehensive History of
Philosophy, began at 9.00 am on Tuesday, 18 October,
2011, with presence of Professor Seyyed Mohammed
Khamenei and many of the authorities in the field of
philosophy and continued until afternoon on Wednesday 18
October, 2011 with the presentation of selected
speeches.
The
Conference was greatly welcomed by philosophy
professors, university students, and other interested
groups. From among the several papers sent to the
Conference Secretariat, 79 of them were accepted. On the
first day of the Conference, 14 professors and experts
on Islamic philosophy presented their speeches in three
sessions. On the second day, 18 professors and
researchers delivered their speeches in three sessions.
On the
first day, after listening to the recitation of some
Qur’anic verses, Dr. Qasim Purhassan, the Scientific
Secretary of the Conference and the chair of the morning
session, spoke about Ibn Sina’s services to philosophy
and Islamic logic. He also referred to Ibn Sina’s famous
book, Danishname-ye ‘Alai’i, and maintained that
it is the first philosophy book in Persian. Following
him, the President of the Sadra Islamic Philosophy
Institute, Professor Seyyed Mohammed Khamenei, delivered
a speech titled “Ibn Sina: An Ishraqi
Philosopher” and made a new claim as to Ibn Sina’s being
an Ishraqi (Illuminationist) and not a
Peripatetic philosopher. The next speaker was Dr. Reza
Dawari Ardakani who presented a speech titled “Ibn
Sina’s Status and Role in Rational Thought.” At the end
of the Opening ceremony of the first day, Dr. Gholamreza
A’awani spoke about “Ibn Sina and Thomas Aquinas.”
The
speakers of the first day of the Conference were as
follows:
First
Session: Ayatullah Seyyed Hassan Mustafawi (Imam Sadiq
University), Dr. Karim Mujtahidi (Tehran University).
Second
Session: Dr. ‘Aynullah Khadimi (Shahid Raja’i
University, Dr. Muhammed J’afar Harandi (Islamic Azad
University, Shahr-e Rey Branch, Dr. Yahya Yathribi (‘Allamah
Tabataba’i University), and Ayatullah Taha Muhammedi
(Leader of Hamedan’s Friday Prayer and President of Bu
Ali Institute).
Third
Session: Dr. Hussein Kalbasi, Dr. Gholamhossein Rahimi,
Dr. Maqsud Muhammedi, and Dr. Gholamhossein Ibrahimi
Dinani.
On the
second day of the Conference, the chosen speakers
presented their speeches on different subjects in
relation to Ibn Sina and Islamic philosophers. The
speakers of this day were as follows:
Fourth
Session: Dr. Reza Suleyman Heshmat, Dr. Hamid Reza
Rasuli Sharabiyani, Dr. ‘Asghari Suleymani Amiri, and
Dr. Nader Shukrullahi.
Fifth
Session: Dr. Mas’ud Umid, Hujjat al-Islam Muhammed
Muttaqi, and Dr. Hassan Fathi.
Sixth
and Seventh Sessions: Dr. Mustafa Muhaqqiq Damad, Dr.
Fereshteh Nadri Abyanah, Dr. Muhsen Jahid, Dr. Murtada
Shajari, Dr. Yusuf Nozuhur, Dr. Reza Mahuzi, Dr. Munireh
Seyyed Mazhari, Dr. Seyyed Mustafa Shahr Ayini, and Dr.
Hussein Atrak.
All the
selected 79 papers will be published in the Proceedings
of Ibn Sina Conference by the Sadra Islamic Philosophy
Institute in the future in order to make them available
to all lovers of Islamic philosophy and wisdom.
Shi’ite
Scholars as Guardians and Disseminators of Ishraqi
Philosophy
Professor Seyyed Muhammed Khamenei, President of the
Sadra Islamic Philosophy Institute and President of the
Scientific Society of History of Philosophy, while
arguing that Ibn Sina was an Ishraqi philosopher
and emphasizing this idea due to his being a Shi’ite
Muslim, asserted that the scholars of the school of
Shi’ism have always tried to protect and spread
Ishraqi Philosophy whether openly or secretly.
In the
course of his speech titled “Ibn Sina: An Ishraqi
Philosopher”, Professor Khamenei explained Ibn Sina’s
philosophical teachings and claimed that he was always
an Ishraqi philosopher. While expressing his
regret about our never having a true historical
knowledge of scholars and philosophers in its real sense
of the word, he added that knowledge and knowers have
always been treated with injustice in the course of
history because whenever they wanted to introduce a
scholar, they spoke of, for example, his birthday in
relation to the ruling period of a specific king. He
believed that this method of introducing scholars, in
which their life is a marginal problem comparing to
their being contemporary to certain kings, is a harsh
cruelty to the field of thought and wisdom. Moreover, in
many cases their ideas are not clearly understood by
others.
In line
with his arguments, he explained, “For example, Ibn Sina
is always introduced as a Peripatetic philosopher while
he himself stipulated that he did not believe in this
school and criticized many of its principles. We see
this point in the Introduction to Hikmat al-Mashriqiyyin.
However, Professor Khamenei stated that there is no
source or book from Ibn Sina on Ishraqi
philosophy available to us, and thus it is very
difficult to study and research this issue. He added
that if we wish to explore Ibn Sina’s affiliation with
Ishraqi philosophy, we must present some proofs
and documented evidence many of which can be found in
our books.
In
order to support his claim, Professor Khamenei quotes
Ibn Sina’s own words in the Introduction to Hikmat
al-Mashriqiyyin, as follows: “Since most knowledge
seekers have turned to Greek philosophy, we have quoted
their words and justified them in order not to oppose
them; however, there were some which could not be
tolerated at all.” He also said that beyond the surface
of Ibn Sina’s words are some meanings which forced him
to deal with Peripatetic Philosophy. Nevertheless, the
truth was that he did not work in the field of
Ishraqi philosophy for his fear of certain people.
Professor Khamenei continued his words by asking why Ibn
Sina and many other philosophers who were either
Shi’ite or not related to the government of the time
had to follow Peripatetic Philosophy. In response to
this question, he first spoke about the Shi’ites’
activities at the beginning of the rise of Islam and
argued that, after Imam Hussein (a) was martyred,
Shi’ism had to follow a secret and underground life.
He added that in all the religious groups branching from
Shi’im, there were some missionaries who were
heirs to Peripatetic philosophy. He claimed that these
missionaries had some scientific conflicts with non-Shi’ites
and, in a sense, advocates of caliphs, and one of their
methods for discussion and dissemination of imamat
(leadership) was resorting to the rational discussions
in Peripatetic Philosophy. However, the government later
discovered their secret and sent Ghazzali to oppose them
in order to defend the Seljuks’ rule. Professor Khamenei
maintained that they used Peripatetic Philosophy as an
instrument, and Ibn Sina was no exception in this
regard. In fact, he was in a way tied with political
Shi’ites.
The
speaker said that research on the history of Shi’ite
and Isharqi philosophers has revealed that there
have always been some connections between Shi’ism
and Ishraqi philosophies, which were kept secret.
One of the hidden points is that, unlike what is
commonly known, they were Shi’ite scholars who
guarded Isharqi philosophy either openly or under
the guise of theology.
By
referring to the fact the ‘Allamah Hilli taught Fakhr
al-muhaqqiqin and Suhrawardi’s Hikmat al-ishraq
to his son, and that Shahidin had also included
Ishraqi Philosophy in their teaching program,
Professor Khamenei emphasized that Ishraqi
philosophy was basically a stand for Shi’ism
rather than an educational course and was perhaps
equated with Islamic gnosis.
He also
posed the idea that, in namat 9 of al-Isharat,
Ibn Sina clearly shows that this judgment was higher
than illumination, and he himself was also a man of
mystery and many secrets.
At the
end of his speech, Professor Khamenei maintained that
Ibn Sina was both a Peripatetic and an Ishraqi
philosopher and expressed hope that this approach is
followed in philosophical analyses of his work. This is
because Ibn Sina shows his Ishraqi interests
between the lines of his Peripatetic ideas.
Back to Titles
|

|
 |